Page 38 - Layout 1
P. 38



From the Brig






Risky Business?






ISSA’s legal expert Bruce Hailey discusses 

the issues that matter to you









decision can have serious implications. the middle man that is important and 
It is not only new business where this should be factored into a supplier’s 

care should be taken. It is human decision making process when offering 
nature to think the best of people, more credit. With such arrangements, the 

so when we have worked with them for likelihood of delay is greater, as it takes 
a long time. It is very easy to see credit time for money to flow through the 
I
exposure to existing clients rise steadily, longer chain of parties.
unnoticed. It is therefore important to When supplying a vessel at the 

undertake a regular review of existing request of a catering company or 

n a global industry where most customers, to consider whether the
another supplier extra care should, 
business is conducted by email it credit risk has altered.
therefore, be taken to establish whether 

can be difficult for a supplier to There are some important
they personally are reputable as well as 
really understand who they are dealing whether the vessel and her owners are questions that any supplier should be 

with, and to appreciate the risks of reputable. Caterers working with asking themselves when a RFQ arrives. 
doing business with, and offering credit owners who have poor payment habits Who is making the request to you; is it 

to, a particular party. This is a subject will be under financial pressure, which the vessel’s owner, a third party 
touched upon in the September 2013 will be likely to result in delays in manager, a catering company or, as we 

article, but given the number of payment to the physical supplier.
are seeing more and more, another 
enquiries made to Salvus Law on the supplier?
Where the supply is to be made to 

subject it seems to merit more detailed the owner, whether directly or through The risk profile attached to each of 
consideration.
a ship manager, then an assessment these is different. For example, when 

needs to be made of that owner, the Suppliers will be all too familiar dealing with another supplier or a 

vessel and the owner’s wider fleet, if with the situation - a RFQ arrives from catering company who is acting as a 
there is one. Where the order comes a new prospective customer, seeking an “middle man” in many jurisdictions the 

from a manager it is important to immediate response and urgent supply physical supplier would not have a 
identify the owner behind. The to a vessel already in port. The supplier claim against the vessel they supplied as 

manager relies on the owner to put him has only a short time to assess whether they had not contracted with its owners 
in funds to settle bills, and even the to offer credit, or indeed respond to the or managers but an unrelated third 

most professional managers will RFQ at all. There is an instinctive party. Many suppliers wrongly assume 
encounter problems with vessels
reluctance to turn down the chance of that if they supply a ship and are not 

that they manage for poorly
new business, and handing the chance paid that they could, if necessary, arrest 
to a competitor. However, a poor
the ship. In such cases it is the credit of


















36 The SHIP Supplier Issue 61 2014



   36   37   38   39   40