Page 5 - Layout 1
P. 5



SAFETY & PREPAREDNESS

: 


VETTING



By Capt Atul Vatsa, 
Senior Manager, Marine 

Standards & Vetting, 
KEY TO FLAWLESS OPERATIONTanker Division



Given that market conditions are still very tough, I am pleased The following vessels achieved “NIL” observations during 
to report that the 1st qtr. results are on par with 2015.1st Quarter of 2016:

1st Quarter result: 103 inspections @ 3.23 observations 
per inspection.Ardmore CherokeeKoch

After a good result in Jan (2.88 observation per inspection) Front DeeENOC
the trend has been negative and has had a 20% increase in the JS Greensandp66

number of observations from Jan 2016 to Mar 2016.Front CheetahKoch
Key performance indicators which need improvements on:
BW StreamBP
• 30% of the inspections which are outside the KPI
• 50% of the observations are moderate to High Risk
THOME – 2015 VS 2016
Just as a reminder – some key focus areas for 2016 based 
on the 2015 results are as follows;Comparing 1st Qtr result with 2015
• Remove High Risk Observations

• Reduce the number of repeatsFollowing chapters have had a percentage drop (improved 
• Observations related to Chapter 11 & 12performance)

• Reduce number of observations recorded as “Rectiied• Chapter 4: 12% reduction 
during the inspection”• Chapter 5: 12% reduction 

• Chapter 12:8% reduction
VETTING OBSERVATIONS PER VETTING INSPECTION 2008–2016
10 
Following chapters have had a percentage increase 
9 (Negative performance)
8 
7 • Chapter 6:50% increase 
• Chapter 8:27% increase 
6 
5 • Chapter 11:16% increase
4 
3 THOME (OBVS./INSP.) 2014–2016 PER VIQ CHAPTER

2 OBS./INSP. (2014)OBS./INSP. (2015)OBS./INSP. (2016)
1 0.8 
09.517.486.255.825.164.073.763.243.230.7 
0.6 08091011 3475 771% ON 418% 13 924% 1400
0.5 20202020S – 6.AS 5.S – 5.5 – 2UCTIF – 6.75 –M 20MF 3.0 – 1M 20KPI 3.
STATPI WSTAT– 4.7REDCIMKPI 3.FROOCIPI 3.5FRO16 
0.4 IMF 12 KIMF  KPI O14 ION 5 KION 20
0.3 OC20OC01320DUCT201DUCT
0.2 2RERE
MONTHLY & QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE0.1 

0.0Our Quarterly performance has been encouraging but this & NY TAL NGE NSAL NTNN N& MNSEG TSNS
quarter we have slipped.ION ATIOAFETMENTURITIOORINANCTIONERATIOMENATIOUTIONTIORGO YSTETIONGINERINMENTIO
ICATENT5 - SAGERUCONDMOPEARNDI- GEORMAGEVIGOLLEVE- CAST SNICA1 - E STEARTERA
2010-2016 QUARTERLY PERFORMANCERTIFCUMMAN- STC9 - L AP& CO1 INFMAN - NA6 - PPR8 ALLAMMU1&OMPE OP
 - CEDO7 ERAEW 4BCOC3 – IC
8.00 2GEN3 - CR10- 1
12 - 
7.00 THOME VS OCIMF - CHAPTER 4, 5, 8, 11 & 12
6.00 
0.75
5.00 
4.00 
0.50
3.00 
2.00 

0.251.00 
0.00 5.886.57  6.34 6.145.61  6.23 5.336.13  5.81 5.254.77  4.77 4.464.55  3.50  3.69  3.76  4.18  3.64  3.50 3.48  3.29 3.22  2.97  3.23
353519368422365374384454488478334448361373259273331355310336339187333296373016 016 016.42 .34.78 .58.50 .48.45 .52.32 .48
0.00- 60/- 79/- 58/- 72/- 65/- 60/- 72/- 74/- 84/- 91/- 70/- 94/- 81/- 82/- 74/- 74/- 88/- 85/- 85/- 96/103/- 66/103/- 85/116/Q2 2Q3 2Q4 20000000000
CHAPTER 4CHAPTER 5CHAPTER 8CHAPTER 11CHAPTER 12010 010 010 010 011 011 011 011 012 012 012 012 013 013 013 013 014 014 014 014 15 - 015 16 - 015 15 - 
Key Chapter performance compared to OCIMFQ1 2Q2 2Q3 2Q4 2Q1 2Q2 2Q3 2Q4 2Q1 2Q2 2Q3 2Q4 2Q1 2Q2 2Q3 2Q4 2Q1 2Q2 2Q3 2Q4 2Q2 20Q4 2Q1 20Q1 2Q3 20



| 5
JUNE 2016 | ISSUE 45 



   3   4   5   6   7